Maintenance — what Illinois used to call alimony, and what the federal tax code no longer rewards — is governed by section 504 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. The headline is that there’s a formula. The reality is that the formula is the starting point, not the ending point, in most cases that actually get fought.
The guideline formula
For couples with a combined gross annual income under $500,000 and no obligation under a prior maintenance order:
- Amount = (33.3% × payor’s net annual income) − (25% × payee’s net annual income).
- Cap — the combined amount must not result in the payee receiving more than 40% of the parties’ combined net income.
- Duration — calculated by multiplying the length of the marriage (in years) by a statutory percentage that scales from 20% for short marriages to 100% (indefinite) for marriages of 20 or more years.
Net income for this calculation has its own statutory definition that differs from federal taxable income. Pre-tax retirement contributions, certain health insurance premiums, and prior-order child support are treated specifically.
When the guideline doesn’t apply
The court is not required to follow the formula when combined gross income exceeds $500,000, or when one party has a prior maintenance obligation. In those cases the court determines a reasonable amount and duration considering the section 504 factors.
Deviations from the guideline — even under $500,000
Even when the guideline applies, the court may deviate based on the section 504 factors:
- Income and property of each party, including marital and non-marital allocations from the dissolution itself.
- Needs of each party.
- Realistic earning capacity — current and future, including the effect of foregone career opportunities during the marriage.
- Impairments to earning capacity — domestic responsibilities that delayed education or training; effect of parenting on remaining earning years.
- Time necessary to acquire education or training.
- Standard of living established during the marriage.
- Duration of the marriage.
- Age, health, and station of each party.
- All sources of income including investment income and benefits.
- Tax consequences of the property division on each party.
- Contributions by either party to the education or career of the other.
- Any valid agreement between the parties.
- Any other factor the court expressly finds to be just and equitable.
The federal tax change matters. For divorce judgments entered after December 31, 2018, maintenance is not deductible by the payor and not taxable to the payee. This shifts the after-tax math significantly compared to pre-2019 cases. Old rules of thumb based on tax-deductibility are obsolete — don’t calibrate to them.
Modification and termination
Maintenance can be modified on a showing of a substantial change in circumstances — which is the same standard that applies to child support modifications. Common modification triggers:
- Significant change in income (job loss, retirement, promotion).
- Cohabitation by the recipient with another adult on a continuing conjugal basis (terminates maintenance entirely under section 510(c)).
- Remarriage of the recipient (also terminates maintenance entirely).
- Death of either party (terminates maintenance unless the judgment expressly survives).
Where most maintenance fights actually happen
In most contested cases, the dispute is not over the formula — it’s over the inputs to the formula, or over deviation. Common battlegrounds:
- Imputing income to an unemployed or underemployed party.
- Self-employment income — what counts, what gets added back from depreciation and personal-use expenses.
- Voluntary income reduction — taking a lower-paying job before filing.
- Duration above 20 years — when does "indefinite" actually mean indefinite, and when does it get reviewed.
- Asset-rich, income-low situations — what happens when one party has significant non-income-producing property.
VF Law works through both sides of this — establishing income (and imputing it where warranted) and defending against improper imputation in equal measure. The formula is two lines of statute. The case is everything around it.




